For
the purposes of this paper, higher education is defined
as a sub-sector of tertiary education whose institutions
carry out the functions normally associated with the
traditional university.
The issues discussed are contemporary, but not new.
Nonetheless they are issues that continue to feature
prominently on the higher education agenda. In this
paper they are treated in pairs that directly or indirectly
impact on each other, and include access and quality;
relevance and accountability and co-operation and competition.
Increased access invites the comment made famous during
the expansion of higher education in the U.K. following
the Robbins Report, “More Means Worse.”
But this is not inevitable. More however, does mean
different and unless strategies are adopted to respond
to the more heterogeneous population of students which
is bound to occur with increased access, decline in
quality may be expected.
If accountability is viewed from the perspective of
value for money, then the link between it and relevance
is evident. How one defines relevance then becomes crucial.
And too often relevance is interpreted both narrowly
and in the short term. This represents a real threat
to the crucial role of higher education in promoting
the concept lifelong learning and in preparing society
for the future.
Co-operation in higher education is strongly advocated
in the context of Jamaica.
Four categories of co-operation are examined:
- Co-operation between institutions of higher education
themselves
- Co-operation between higher education and other
tertiary institutions
- Co-operation between higher education and the productive
sector; private and public
- Co-operation between higher education and the school
system.
|