|
Rolstan P. Adams
Lecturer
Dept of Literatures in English,
T.A Marryshow Community College, Grenada
The Global, Structural
and Post-Colonial in Merle Collins’ ANGEL
Collins’ ANGEL has attracted as varied a following
of critics as any other West Indian novel. Probably more than
most, and with good reason. This is a novel, like Martin Carter’s
“Poems of Resistance” won out of eruption and
cataclysm in historical struggle, invasion and imprisonment.
To use imagery suggested by Wilson Harris for this experience,
it is the weak link in the watershed of our tradition: a fissure
out of which flowed, in a moment of history, the eruption
of East-West ideological confrontation. The particular circumstances
qualify the novel for inclusion in the Post-Colonialist revolutionary
politics which Grenada now shares with Latin America and Africa.
To some extent, to take in the full global complexity of
both the fundamental approach to Literature and the circumstances
of the novel itself, Criticsm must adjust its sights to potentials
and possibilities in such a novel as ANGEL which fall somewhat
outside Leavisite analysis,for instance. Among its critics
who have complained of the novel’s solemn preoccupation
with historical events and less with Great Tradition style
– authorial expansion, through commentary, description,
intrusion - are included those who seem not to feel comfortable
with the avowed Marxism of Post-Colonialist writing and criticism.
Thus, one sees a tendency to soft-pedal criticism of this
novel as a novel of Feminism (three generations of Grenadian
women), of Dialect (and not the Dialectic of Struggle). Indeed,
in a privileged statement of informing the author, herself,
explained the novel as part of her explorations of the African
‘Cautionary Tale’. But even while admitting the
writer’s right to state her intention, I am still firmly
of the opinion that ANGEL is best understood in terms of popular
feelings towards the Grenadian Revolution, a faithful record
of
|