|
Philip Nanton
Writer in Residence
UWI School of Continuing Studies
St Vincent
St.Vincent as ‘Frontier
Society’: Two Literary Comparisons
In the opening of Gordon K. Lewis’ ‘Main Currents
in Caribbean Thought’ he chose to identify as his first
diagnostic characteristic of Caribbean societies that ‘they
were, in brief (and among other things) frontier societies’
(Lewis, 1983, 4) He went on to bemoan, with one exception,
the lack of scholarship in the region based on the concept
of frontier and to emphasize its importance in the region.
One way to take up Lewis’ challenge is to locate the
‘frontier’ as the boundary between ‘civilisation’
and ‘the wild’.
In St.Vincent, although the process of conquest and settlement
was protracted, the notion of the island as frontier has long
receded as a focus of analytical interest. However, colonialism,
characterized by both the ‘civilizing mission’
involving the importation of slave labour, and the ‘Great
Experiment’ of implementing free labour, continued,
albeit through fundamentally racist ideologies, to direct
attention to the relationship between changed notions of ‘wild’
and civilized’. In the twentieth century, political
independence brought with it a revival of interest in civilization
as part of the official ideology of nation-building. At the
same time notions of the place as ‘wilderness’
were apparently lost. The demands of developmental ideology
and modernity in the context of political independence and
nation state formation in the twentieth century; the second
wave of globalization and the associated revived interest
in enhanced regionalism have all provided ideological constructs
which appear to be antithetical to the development of contemporary
frontier analysis.
It appears to be generally assumed that because the society
was settled long ago, any identification with an idea of frontier
belongs to the past. In this paper I intend to argue otherwise
and provide what I identify as a corrective to the neglect
of the frontier element of this relationship. I wish to argue
that the concept of frontier, linked to concepts of civilization
and wilderness, continues to be important to the Caribbean
or at least to the way that parts of the region are perceived.
To do this my paper will first sketch some ways in which the
region is perceived as a modern frontier – holding the
balance between ‘wilderness’ and ‘civilisation’.
Then I propose to compare two views of St. Vincent as frontier
society. One is presented through the journal of the stipendiary
magistrate John Anderson and the second is to be found in
Margaret Atwood’s novel ‘Bodily Harm’ part
of which is set in a thinly disguised St. Vincent in the late
twentieth century.
I suggest that the frontier for both insiders and outsiders
to the society continues to be located through a combination
of untamable environment, personal dislocation and a context
of experimentation where the rules are opaque.
|