PRESENTING AND DOCUMENTING
SOURCED
MATERIAL IN COURSE ESSAYS
Students
often run into trouble when presenting and documenting
material in course essays. The following guidelines
should help students to steer clear of any of the pitfalls
that might result in being penalised for breaching academic
standards. All class essays are expected to follow the
advice given in this section. If you need further help,
consult Patrick Dunleavy's excellent book Studying for
a Degree in the Humanities and Social Sciences (Macmillan,
1986). Plagiarism will not be tolerated, so read this
section thoroughly in order to steer clear of trouble.
Remember, it is your responsibility to ensure that your
essays adhere to the standards of academic integrity,
so if someone else types your essay make sure that you
check that the typist has not changed the way in which
you present or document borrowed material in any way.
Types
of Borrowed Material. There are three basic
ways in which students may incorporate the ideas that
they have confronted in their reading in their essays:
quotation, summary and paraphrase. Far too many students
misunderstand the differences between these.
Quotation.
With a quotation, you present another writer's idea
in that writer's words. You must indicate the borrowing
with either quotation marks or block indentation, combined
with a footnote/endnote reference. For example:
According
to Stigler, "every industry or occupation that has enough
political power to utilize the state will seek to control
entry. In addition, the regulatory policy will often
be so fashioned as to retard the rate of growth of new
firms."1
Summary. A
summary is where you present another writer's idea,
only not his or her words; further, you present only
the core of the idea-the main point-because you condense
the idea as you reword it. You must also indicate the
borrowing with a footnote/endnote, usually combined
with an introduction (called a frame) that also attributes
the summary. Here is a summary of the sample quotation:
Stigler
argues that influential economic interests seek regulations
that reduce competition.1
Paraphrase.
A paraphrase is like a summary in that you present only
another writer's idea, not his exact words; this time,
however, instead of compressing the idea, you restate
it in your own words. Thus, the paraphrase is a
little like a translation. Although it isn't usually
a word-for-word substitution, it often follows the pattern
of the original wording. Again you must indicate
the borrowing with a footnote or endnote, usually combined
with an introduction that also attributes the paraphrase.
Here is a paraphrase of the sample quotation from Stigler:
Stigler
says that economic interests with sufficient influence
over government policy will try to bring about public
policies that deter competition from other firms. They
will also encourage rules and regulations that are detrimental
to new rivals.1
All
three types of presentation use borrowed ideas, but
only a quotation uses borrowed words. You can mix
another writer's words into your summary or paraphrase,
but you must show the specific borrowing in quotation
marks. Here is our example summary with a touch
of quotation thrown in:
Stigler
says that the economic interests with sufficient "power
to utilize the state" will seek regulation that operates
to reduce the threat of competition from potential rivals.1
This
is legitimate. However, the following mixture of paraphrase
and unacknowledged quotations (the exact words from
the original are underlined) is not legitimate and,
if detected will incur a penalty.
According
to Stigler, economic interests that have enough political
power to utilize the state will use that power to control
entry. In addition, they will try to encourage the creation
of regulations which retard the rate of growth of new
firms.1
The
writer of such a sentence would be in trouble whether
or not she had included the footnote or endnote at the
end of the supposed paraphrase because she has used
exact wording without quotation marks. (See the discussion
of plagiarism later in this course outline.)
Framing
Your Presentation. Whether you quote, summarise,
or paraphrase, you must give due attribution to your
source, by framing the borrowed idea with an introduction
and a footnote/endnote. Your endnote must include a
specific reference to the text from which you borrowed
the material including page numbers. Keep in mind that,
in the absence of a quotation, the reference in a footnote
or endnote refers only to the single sentence that the
notation follows. Of course, quotation marks or block
indentations indicate the length of a quotation. But
summaries and paraphrases don't have such ready mechanical
indicators. However, you can frame a borrowing
(especially a summary or paraphrase) with an introduction
and a footnote. An introduction like "Stigler argues"
or "According to Christopher Hood, Stigler argues" will
indicate the beginning of a borrowing, and the footnote/endnote
reference will indicate the end. Then the footnote
reference applies to the entire borrowing.
Framing
Hints. To work borrowed material into your
papers, you must frame it gracefully as well as responsibly. There
are many varied ways to frame a quotation, paraphrase,
or summary. Here is an example of the most common
approach:
According
to Stigler, "every industry or occupation that has enough
political power to utilize the state will seek to control
entry. In addition, the regulatory policy will often
be so fashioned as to retard the rate of growth of new
firms."1
Don't
rely solely on this frame, or your writing will seem
mechanical and monotonous. Consider the alternatives
below, and also note how the authors of your reading
assignments frame their references to others.
Variations
on the "According to" frame:
It
was Mancur Olson who first pointed out that "unless
the number of individuals is quite small, or unless
there is coercion or some other special device to make
individuals act in their common interest, rational self-interested
individuals will not act to achieve their common or
group interests." 1
In
their article, "Institutional Perspectives on Political
Institutions", March and Olsen contrast the bargaining
or exchange account of politics with an institutional
story which "characterizes politics in a more integrative
fashion, emphasising the creation of identities and
institutions as well as their structuring effect on
political life." 1
The
Interrupting Frame:
"Tales
of monumental blunders, blatant self interest and corruption,
self-destructive organizational civil wars and feuds,
astonishing failures to look ahead or take any initiative
in the face of the most pressing problems are," as Christopher
Hood argues in The Art of the State, "far from unusual
in most societies." 1
The
Separate-Sentence Frame:
"If
bureaucrats are ordinary men, they will make most (not
all) of their decisions in terms of what benefits them,
not society as a whole." 1 In these terms, Gordon Tullock
makes a departure from the orthodox assumption in public
administration that public servants act in the public
interest.
Errors
to Avoid. Errors in presentation and documentation
range from minor ones that merit an admonishment and
a point or two deduction to major ones like plagiarism
that will result in zero grades and reference to the
Examinations Committee.
Minor
Errors-Format. On one end of the spectrum are
minor errors in format. There are formats in all
parts of life: don't eat peas with a knife; don't begin
a bibliography entry with an author's first name. For
those who ignore formats, punishments range from an
admonishment to a deduction of a few points from a paper's
grade.
Major
Errors-Plagiarism. At the opposite end of the
trouble spectrum is plagiarism. Plagiarism involves
presenting someone else's words or ideas without giving
proper credit. Therefore, you obviously plagiarize (a)
if you present someone else's words as though they were
your own (by seeming to summarize or paraphrase when
in fact you quote directly) or (b) if you present someone
else's ideas without giving proper credit (by failing
to document at all). Punishment depends on the
extent of the offence. But you should realize this:
any plagiarism violates academic integrity, so anything
beyond the most minor, accidental plagiarism will usually
result in a zero grade for a paper, with no chance to
rewrite.
Major
Errors-Other. On the trouble spectrum between
minor errors and plagiarism, there are other serious
errors that can bring severe punishment. All of
them breach academic integrity (making a zero grade
possible) and any of them could be evidence of cheating. As
with plagiarism, the extent of the error will determine
the extent of the punishment.
Blanket
Notes. Remember that, except with quotations,
a footnote or endnote generally covers only the preceding
sentence. The old student standby device of putting
a notation at the end of a paragraph to document something
in the paragraph just won't work. The problem could,
of course, simply be sloppy presentation, or the sloppiness
could be interpreted as an attempt to disguise cheating. Avoid
the trouble by using the frame of introduction and parenthetical
notation to indicate where a borrowing begins and ends.
Wrongly
Attributed Borrowing. You must attribute the
material you borrow to the source you actually use. For
example, you find in a book by Smith a quotation Smith
borrowed from another book by Jones. If you use
the Jones quotation, you must document the borrowing
as material from Jones that you found in a book by Smith.
You cannot, however, document the passage as if you
had found it in the book by Jones or as if Smith himself
had written it. Either of these ways misattributes
the quotation, and you could be accused of deceiving
your reader by claiming you'd read Jones' book.
Padded
Bibliographies. If you use a simple one-part
bibliography, you must list only the works you actually
cite in your paper. You cannot list other works
you didn't cite but which you think the reader should
be aware of. Listing works not cited in the paper
gives the appearance that you've done more work than
you really have. So how can you show works that
influenced you but that you didn't borrow material from? Use
a two-part bibliography, the first part called "Works
Cited" and the second part called "Works Consulted." Their
formats are the same.