FSS Committees Evaluation Form

This survey is part of our ongoing efforts to improve the effectiveness of the Faculty’s committees.
Kindly take a few moments to share your experience as a committee member and offer suggestions for improvement.
Please note that all responses will remain confidential.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1. Select the term for which this evaluation is applicable. *

2. Select the name of the committee on which you served. *

3. How long have you served on this committee? *

4. What role did you play on this committee? *

5. Do you expect to serve on this committee again next year? *

6. How many OTHER committees have you served on this academic year? *

7. Which of the following categories best describe you? *

8. To which department are you assigned? *

9. How often has the committee's processes, interactions, and outcomes during the year reflected the following characteristics:

As you answer the questions below, consider the internal processes, external interactions, and work products/outcomes

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Disagree	Strongly Disagree	NA
Transparent: proceedings are well documented and available for Faculty review.	Transparent: proceedings are well documented and available for Faculty review. - Strongly Agree	Transparent: proceedings are well documented and available for Faculty review. - Agree	Transparent: proceedings are well documented and available for Faculty review. - Disagree	Transparent: proceedings are well documented and available for Faculty review. - Strongly Disagree	Transparent: proceedings are well documented and available for Faculty review. - NA
Collaborative: is inclusive and open to input from all with respect for diverse opinions.	Collaborative: is inclusive and open to input from all with respect for diverse opinions. - Strongly Agree	Collaborative: is inclusive and open to input from all with respect for diverse opinions. - Agree	Collaborative: is inclusive and open to input from all with respect for diverse opinions. - Disagree	Collaborative: is inclusive and open to input from all with respect for diverse opinions. - Strongly Disagree	Collaborative: is inclusive and open to input from all with respect for diverse opinions. - NA
Relevant: engages in meaningful dialogue.	Relevant: engages in meaningful dialogue. - Strongly Agree	Relevant: engages in meaningful dialogue. - Agree	Relevant: engages in meaningful dialogue. - Disagree	Relevant: engages in meaningful dialogue. - Strongly Disagree	Relevant: engages in meaningful dialogue. - NA
Engaged: is involved in effective and meaningful communication with the Faculty.	Engaged: is involved in effective and meaningful communication with the Faculty. - Strongly Agree	Engaged: is involved in effective and meaningful communication with the Faculty. - Agree	Engaged: is involved in effective and meaningful communication with the Faculty. - Disagree	Engaged: is involved in effective and meaningful communication with the Faculty. - Strongly Disagree	Engaged: is involved in effective and meaningful communication with the Faculty. - NA
Productive: works properly and productively toward its intended results.	Productive: works properly and productively toward its intended results. - Strongly Agree	Productive: works properly and productively toward its intended results. - Agree	Productive: works properly and productively toward its intended results. - Disagree	Productive: works properly and productively toward its intended results. - Strongly Disagree	Productive: works properly and productively toward its intended results. - NA
Efficient: makes efficient use of time to produce results.	Efficient: makes efficient use of time to produce results. - Strongly Agree	Efficient: makes efficient use of time to produce results. - Agree	Efficient: makes efficient use of time to produce results. - Disagree	Efficient: makes efficient use of time to produce results. - Strongly Disagree	Efficient: makes efficient use of time to produce results. - NA
Evidence-Based: relies on accurate information rather than speculation and anecdote.	Evidence-Based: relies on accurate information rather than speculation and anecdote. - Strongly Agree	Evidence-Based: relies on accurate information rather than speculation and anecdote. - Agree	Evidence-Based: relies on accurate information rather than speculation and anecdote. - Disagree	Evidence-Based: relies on accurate information rather than speculation and anecdote. - Strongly Disagree	Evidence-Based: relies on accurate information rather than speculation and anecdote. - NA

10. Please indicate the extent to which you agree/disagree with the following statements about your service on this committee:

As you answer the questions below, consider the internal processes, external interactions, and work products/outcomes

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Disagree	Strongly Disagree	NA
I feel comfortable contributing ideas	I feel comfortable contributing ideas - Strongly Agree	I feel comfortable contributing ideas - Agree	I feel comfortable contributing ideas - Disagree	I feel comfortable contributing ideas - Strongly Disagree	I feel comfortable contributing ideas - NA
My ideas are treated with respect, whether or not others agree with them	My ideas are treated with respect, whether or not others agree with them - Strongly Agree	My ideas are treated with respect, whether or not others agree with them - Agree	My ideas are treated with respect, whether or not others agree with them - Disagree	My ideas are treated with respect, whether or not others agree with them - Strongly Disagree	My ideas are treated with respect, whether or not others agree with them - NA
I have had sufficient opportunity to provide input into committee recommendations	I have had sufficient opportunity to provide input into committee recommendations - Strongly Agree	I have had sufficient opportunity to provide input into committee recommendations - Agree	I have had sufficient opportunity to provide input into committee recommendations - Disagree	I have had sufficient opportunity to provide input into committee recommendations - Strongly Disagree	I have had sufficient opportunity to provide input into committee recommendations - NA
The committee's mandate was clearly defined.	The committee's mandate was clearly defined. - Strongly Agree	The committee's mandate was clearly defined. - Agree	The committee's mandate was clearly defined. - Disagree	The committee's mandate was clearly defined. - Strongly Disagree	The committee's mandate was clearly defined. - NA

11. Please rate the following aspects of the committee's overall work this year:

As you answer the questions below, consider the internal processes, external interactions, and work products/outcomes

	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor	Very Poor	NA
Quality of communication within the committee	Quality of communication within the committee - Very Good	Quality of communication within the committee - Good	Quality of communication within the committee - Fair	Quality of communication within the committee - Poor	Quality of communication within the committee - Very Poor	Quality of communication within the committee - NA
Quality of secretarial support	Quality of secretarial support - Very Good	Quality of secretarial support - Good	Quality of secretarial support - Fair	Quality of secretarial support - Poor	Quality of secretarial support - Very Poor	Quality of secretarial support - NA
Effective input to Faculty decision makers	Effective input to Faculty decision makers - Very Good	Effective input to Faculty decision makers - Good	Effective input to Faculty decision makers - Fair	Effective input to Faculty decision makers - Poor	Effective input to Faculty decision makers - Very Poor	Effective input to Faculty decision makers - NA
Access to data needed for deliberations	Access to data needed for deliberations - Very Good	Access to data needed for deliberations - Good	Access to data needed for deliberations - Fair	Access to data needed for deliberations - Poor	Access to data needed for deliberations - Very Poor	Access to data needed for deliberations - NA
Access to meeting space	Access to meeting space - Very Good	Access to meeting space - Good	Access to meeting space - Fair	Access to meeting space - Poor	Access to meeting space - Very Poor	Access to meeting space - NA
Access to other resources needed for the committee to work effectively	Access to other resources needed for the committee to work effectively - Very Good	Access to other resources needed for the committee to work effectively - Good	Access to other resources needed for the committee to work effectively - Fair	Access to other resources needed for the committee to work effectively - Poor	Access to other resources needed for the committee to work effectively - Very Poor	Access to other resources needed for the committee to work effectively - NA
Training or mentoring for you as a committee member	Training or mentoring for you as a committee member - Very Good	Training or mentoring for you as a committee member - Good	Training or mentoring for you as a committee member - Fair	Training or mentoring for you as a committee member - Poor	Training or mentoring for you as a committee member - Very Poor	Training or mentoring for you as a committee member - NA
Establishment of expectations and norms for committee members	Establishment of expectations and norms for committee members - Very Good	Establishment of expectations and norms for committee members - Good	Establishment of expectations and norms for committee members - Fair	Establishment of expectations and norms for committee members - Poor	Establishment of expectations and norms for committee members - Very Poor	Establishment of expectations and norms for committee members - NA
Adherence to expectations and norms by committee members	Adherence to expectations and norms by committee members - Very Good	Adherence to expectations and norms by committee members - Good	Adherence to expectations and norms by committee members - Fair	Adherence to expectations and norms by committee members - Poor	Adherence to expectations and norms by committee members - Very Poor	Adherence to expectations and norms by committee members - NA
Adherence to expectations and norms by the committee chairs	Adherence to expectations and norms by the committee chairs - Very Good	Adherence to expectations and norms by the committee chairs - Good	Adherence to expectations and norms by the committee chairs - Fair	Adherence to expectations and norms by the committee chairs - Poor	Adherence to expectations and norms by the committee chairs - Very Poor	Adherence to expectations and norms by the committee chairs - NA

12. Please enter the improvement most needed by this committee in its processes, interactions, outcomes, or other aspect of its work:

13. Please enter this committee's most significant accomplishment(s) this year.

14. Please include any additional comments.

Thank you!

Online Systems

Student Services

Registration & Fees

Online Support

The University of the West Indies, Mona

The Faculty of Social Sciences

This survey is part of our ongoing efforts to improve the effectiveness of the Faculty’s committees.

Kindly take a few moments to share your experience as a committee member and offer suggestions for improvement.

Please note that all responses will remain confidential.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________